New Rules: Part Four

13)  You must tell every child you meet that there is no Santa Claus.

For some unknown reason your President believes that our children need sex education as early as Kindergarten! As if our children are not already being forced by our society to grow up faster every year, Obama wants them to lose their innocence even faster. As the Chairperson for the Illinois State Senate's Health and Services Committee, Obama oversaw the SB 99 Illinois bill to introduce "Comprehensive Sex Education" to Illinois school children in classes K thru 12. This bill was passed in March 2003. Only two other states have sex education for Kindergarten, California and Massachusetts, which is no big surprise.

During the campaign when McCain called Obama on this, true to his form of the escalating excuses as per Ayers and Wright, Obama first lied and stated that McCain's false accusation was, "shameful and downright perverse." As the heat was turned up on the Kindergarten sex education issue, and it was pointed out that unlike most everything else from Obama's past this bill had not been locked away from the public eye, Obama then stated that his only intent was to protect these children from "sexual predators." Later he added that this sex education would be taught in "an age appropriate manner."

So what does Obama want to teach these little munchkins of Kindergarten in an "age appropriate manner?" According to the bill Obama would have these classes from K to 12 learn the following using "factual information" that is "medically accurate" and of course, in "an age appropriate manner":

A) Prevention of sexually transmitted diseases including the prevention and spreading of HIV.

Laws pertaining to the financial obligations of parenthood.

C) All types of contraception to prevent pregnancy and the spread of disease.

D) Time would be allotted for discussions on the tolerance of same sex relationships.

E) And of course, teaching little Suzy and Tommy what they have that is different, how it all works, the results when it does all work, and where it is all supposed to intersect!

Now please tell me, how do you teach a five-year-old any of this in "an age appropriate manner?" Then tell me why you would ever want to?

Yet this is not even the most obscene part of this bill! As in most things that politicians say and do what is most important is what they have chosen to omit. As in all bills before a congress the bills are written and then sent to a committee to be debated, amended and finalized. It was the same with SB 99 and what they omitted is as telling about the mindset of your new President as what they finally passed into law. These following items, among others, were crossed out of the original bill.

A) Originally these sex education classes were only to be taught to grades 6 thru 12. The 6 was crossed out and the classes were then extended to include grades from K to 12.

While it is mentioned as a form of contraception and for the prevention of spreading disease, it was stricken that "abstinence was the expected norm."

C) Likewise deemed unworthy, "abstinence is the only protection that is 100% effective in the prevention of unwanted pregnancy and the prevention of the spread of disease and HIV."

D) Also crossed out, "Pupils should abstain from sex until they are ready for marriage."

E) Plus, "Discussions of the possible emotional and psychological consequences of preadolescent and adolescent sex outside of marriage and the consequences of an unwanted pregnancy." Gone.

F) Again crossed out: "Pupils will be taught that it is wrong to take advantage of or to exploit another person." (You see if they learn this they can't grow up to be politicians!)

G) But here is the kicker: "Course material and instruction shall teach honor and respect for monogamous heterosexual marriage." (Well no it won't because this was stricken from the bill and the curriculum, but it will be all right to discuss tolerance for same sex relationships.)

Obama stated that this bill was intended to teach Kindergarteners about "sexual predators." Yet nowhere in this bill does it mention predators, crossed out or not. Since when do you have to explain all of the details to a small child on why it is important not to talk to strangers? Is it really necessary to tell a small child exactly what will happen if they fall prey to a sexual predator? Obama also states that this will be "taught in an age appropriate manner." But nowhere in this bill is this age appropriate manner explained, set out or even stated just who will determine what is age appropriate? Well now here for the first time for the Kindergarteners and just to clear things up for Obama, I'll give it a shot.

Suzy you are a girl, Tommy you are a boy, now play nice and go study your ABC's.

Now before you Obamaites start jumping up and down, do this. Google 'SB 99 Illinois' and read this bill yourself. This is the official website of the Illinois General Assembly where you can see this bill, crossed out items and all. This bill is also Obama's only major accomplishment during two terms in the Illinois Senate. As we know, in his limited, short appearance as a US Senator, he accomplished even less! One idiotic bill providing sex education for five-year-olds in ten years, boy, now we're talking experience!

Sex education is needed in school, but not at the Kindergarten level. Seven or eight through twelve is enough. Sex, contraception, teen pregnancy and disease prevention is not for small children. They have other things to worry about like watching, 'Wow! Wow! Wubbzy!' Obama and you should know this. Let children be children and give their parents at least a few years to raise them as they see fit before you turn everything over to big government. It is the family and the home where children should learn the morality of what is right or wrong. Besides the human race has not had a problem in procreating so far as over population is becoming a problem. In fact, as the results of the last election have shown, it is obvious that the gene pool is getting rather thin. So if you really want to mess up a five-year-old boy for life, who has just recently discovered his 'special purpose', tell him that there are diseases out there that can make that little thing fall off. But first, just to help these tykes adjust to their premature loss of innocence play a little hardball and tell them how there is no Santa Claus, Easter Bunny or Tooth Fairy. For in your world Obama is the only one these children should look to for free gifts.


To Be Continued:

New Rules: Part One

New Rules: Part Two

New Rules: Part Three

New Rules: Part Five


 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 13 November 2008, 8:56 PM Corin wrote:
    I tried so hard to get people to listen to me about so many of the things that you have written. Mostly my words went in one ear and out the other as people just did not want to listen to me.

    Your blog is not back in our paper so maybe I can get some people to come here and read some of your writings.
    Reply to this
  • 13 November 2008, 11:40 PM angela wrote:
    I dont believe in schools teaching my children at all. I taught my own. I didnt teach it too early, like o wants to. I would not let my children go to those classes. Especially if they are teaching the same sex stuff. That is up to me to teach my children about that. My parents told me very little and I am fine. I had a child hood. Thank you Mike.
    Reply to this
  • 14 November 2008, 12:18 AM msbloomy wrote:
    You've got a little more humor here, ~ and I agree 7-8 is a good age to get started~ it's even better if their parents would be so kind as to talk to them at home~ like when they have a new baby~ :->
    Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.